Bradders
Member
Very good point indeed. It would only work (if it did indeed work) when not using the internal heater.Not sure that would work in the the version as heater would end up being in direct contact with the filter media.
Very good point indeed. It would only work (if it did indeed work) when not using the internal heater.Not sure that would work in the the version as heater would end up being in direct contact with the filter media.
Thank you! I'll add some more. It was quite tricky even getting the 4 of them in since any slight movement would dislodge another and push it out. I'll do my best! Or maybe I'll have to cut some in half to fit on the edges.Hi @Courtneybst - I just saw your post in your lovely Journal - but I did not want to stop the flow (no pun intended) there, so I am posting here!
To prevent water from taking the least path of resistance and ensure that it flows through the media, you should try to pack the pot scrubbers in a little more. As a guide, if you can see the grills below, I would add more pot scrubbers. There is a reason Oase cuts its foams to ensure they are a perfect fit (see example), and you should try to emulate that with the pot scrubbers.
I am thinking that squashing the green one up a little and adding another in that bottom corner might help achieve that.
View attachment 216923
View attachment 216924
Absolute pleasure. Make sure you can imagine that water is 'forced' to move through the pot scrubbers and cannot (to any huge degree) go around them. And then I think you are all set on that tray.Thank you! I'll add some more. It was quite tricky even getting the 4 of them in since any slight movement would dislodge another and push it out. I'll do my best! Or maybe I'll have to cut some in half to fit on the edges.
I use alfagrog as well. 25mm. Cheap and I never need to replace it.I've used alfagrog for years and never had a problem. It's cheap and effective in my eyes
I use alfagrog as well. 25mm. Cheap and I never need to replace it.
There is nothing wrong with Alfagrog - it's just 3 times less effective at providing surface area than a 20PPI sponge.I've used alfagrog for years and never had a problem. It's cheap and effective in my eyes
That is not what all the articles I have read online would suggest. It seems to be rated as having one of the highest surface areas.There is nothing wrong with Alfagrog - it's just 3 times less effective at providing surface area than a 20PPI sponge.
They do indeed have "high" surface areas. That is, without question. And probably what you are reading.That is not what all the articles I have read online would suggest. It seems to be rated as having one of the highest surface areas.
I don't think you can get rid of the trays at all, they create the duct that sends the water to the bottom, so that it can run through the media from bottom to top.Very good point indeed. It would only work (if it did indeed work) when not using the internal heater.
Yes, I am coming to the same conclusion. The trays are an important part of the 'structure'.I don't think you can get rid of the trays at all, they create the duct that sends the water to the bottom, so that it can run through the media from bottom to top.
I don’t take much notice of marketing when it comes to Aquarium Technology, including media etc. I came across this recently though, I wonder if a copy of this university study is available? Not for me I might add, as I doubt I’d understand it! 😀The way I look at this (ONLY in terms of man-made filter media, not in terms of plants and their undoubted benefits which I am NOT well versed in) is that you need a lot of holes in the media which the beneficial bacteria can live.
Yes, I wonder what that and also wonder who might have commissioned it?!🤫I wonder if a copy of this university study is available?
where did you come across this? University studies are often available on line, so if you can find a source/author name you might be able to get hold of the study.I came across this recently though, I wonder if a copy of this university study is available? Not for me I might add, as I doubt I’d understand it!
And how much water flows through it after 6 months useIt will be interesting to find out how small those 'holes' are.
For media to be effective, it must flow through the media and not around it. I cannot see how water is going to flow through that - even with the 'air test' that the guy in the video did.
View attachment 216958
I don't have access to it either. It is from 1999 and has subsequently been <"cited 86 times">. I'm pretty sure I'll be able to access at least one follow up paper.I think this is the Study, but I don't have access.
Simultaneous Nitrification and Denitrification using SiporaxTM Packing | Water Science & Technology | IWA Publishing
In this paper, we examine a biofilm process for simultaneous removal of ammonia and NOX (nitrite and nitrate). SiporaxTM, a porous Raschig-ring type filteriwaponline.com
Simultaneous nitrification and denitrification using Siporax™ packing
P. Menoud, C.H. Wong, H.A. Robinson, A. Farquhar, J.P. Barford, G.W. Barton
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
We used <"Siporax type media"> a little bit when we did the wastewater work, but <"they foul really easily">, which is why I'm guessing that most more recent work has looked at <"floating cell media in MBBR reactors">.And how much water flows through it after 6 months use
When I put some Siporax in my Biomaster 350 they went from white to brown in maybe six months. I put some in my Eheim Classic about six months ago and they are still pretty white. Due to the design, bypass on the Eheim isn’t really possible. On any other canister I’ve had, including the Biomaster it seems to happen all too easily. In fairness though I have a pre filter sponge on the inlet pipe of the Eheim.Hi all,
We used <"Siporax type media"> a little bit when we did the wastewater work, but <"they foul really easily">, which is why I'm guessing that most more recent work has looked at <"floating cell media in MBBR reactors">.
cheers Darrel