Interesting. Why do you think bypassing occurs on non-EHEIM equipment?On any other canister I’ve had, including the Biomaster it seems to happen all too easily.
Very interesting that the EHEIM is clean, and the Biomaster tray is covered. I can't figure out why that would be the case. Are these filters on the same aquarium?I’ve just done some maintenance so took a couple of pictures. The Siporax is still pretty clean in the Eheim. The stuff in the Biomaster has been in there a lot longer but I remember being disappointed at how quickly it got dirty.
I don’t think it’s specifically Eheim equipment, but rather the design. On an Eheim Classic, or an ADA Superjet (and the copies), the water can’t really bypass the media in the canister. It has to flow through it. On various other designs the water has other routes it can take. I found this out on my Eheim Classic 250. It came with a basket so I used it. I found very dirty water at the top of the media which suggested to me some of the water was flowing outside the basket. Once I took out the basket and made my own - which is a snug fit in the canister - the issue went away. I’d be surprised if later Eheim designs didn’t suffer from bypass like most of the others out there.Interesting. Why do you think bypassing occurs on non-EHEIM equipment?
Here’s a copy of the article kindly sent to me by Sera.I've emailed them and asked for a reference.
I think the reason in this case is that I have a foam “pre filter” on the inlet pipe for the Eheim. I believe that some of the flow on the Biomaster bypasses its internal pre filter.OK, I think I get what you are saying. Some designs always allow a degree of 'flow through' to minimise clogging. Is that basically your view?
I think the only question I would have around that was why the EHEIM tray looks untouched and the Oase looks touched. Surely something can only get 'mucky' if there flow is going through it?
Funnily enough, I looked at the Aquarium Science website and contacted Dave, who is into media pros and cons. He pointed me to this link, which has his view on Siporax - moreover, in the denitrification claims. Certainly an interesting read. (Siporax section is quite a way down).Here’s a copy of the article kindly sent to me by Sera.
I think the only question I would have around that was why the EHEIM tray looks untouched and the Oase looks touched. Surely something can only get 'mucky' if there flow is going through it?
I agree. I was thinking that the brown is good stuff and it shows that the media is populated well. i.e. I am reassured when I see it!Any biological media well populated by microbial mulm will (and should) go brown. The ceramic media in the lower picture has a good (and what I would consider correct) layer of microbial film over it. The media in the upper image is still clean, and has next to no microbial film, suggesting very little bacterial population.
Same for me.I was thinking that the brown is good stuff and it shows that the media is populated well. i.e. I am reassured when I see it!
You might assume that but if that was the case why is the aquarium not suffering high nitrite or ammonia levels?The media in the upper image is still clean, and has next to no microbial film, suggesting very little bacterial population.
You might assume that but if that was the case why is the aquarium not suffering high nitrite or ammonia levels?
I strongly suspect the brown stuff is just detritus.
Edit: Just to add, when the Biomaster had plastic media in it as well at the same time, it was not covered in brown detritus.
Most likely because the majority of the ammonia processing is being conducted by the substrate and plants (assuming its a planted tank). Our filters take something of a back seat role in the nitrogen cycle on planted tanks.
What @Wookii says, because the plants (and microbes in the pre-filter and substrate) are sucking it all up.You might assume that but if that was the case why is the aquarium not suffering high nitrite or ammonia levels?
I strongly suspect the brown stuff is just detritus.
The brown colour will be a microbial biofilm, the colour is mainly the <"difficult to decompose"> carbon compounds. I like brown, but I don't like the <"biofilm to get too thick">At the end the day though, a well seeded filter media should never look that clean
and that is <"the great advantage"> of <"Kaldnes type floating cell media">. There are some scientific references in <"Is expensive bio media worth it?">.The plastic media is great because it agitates in the flow and the microbial film gets constantly renewed.
It still should have been fairly brown - all mine is, even in my wet/dry trickle filter that has a 25 micron fleeces roller ahead of it. The plastic media is great because it agitates in the flow and the microbial film gets constantly renewed. The ceramic media in the image can't operate in that way and is static, so the film just continues to build up.
You can easily cut down the 20ppi blue foams to half height by dampenening them (damp not soaked) and then freezing them for a couple of hours. The frozen foam will stand up to some pressure so now you can cut it with a large and sharp unserrated knife such as a Japanese Yanagiba.Have any of you seen the top, half height, foam filters in anything other than 30ppi?