Re: Low-tech aquarium
I can get harder to grow plants like P.helferi to grow but not Lilaeopsis - I assume that is Lilaeopsis as your middle foreground plant?
Also is that Hydrocotyle you have growing in the foreground in the 1st pictures? I didn't notice in the later pictures how did you find it in your set up did it grow much?
How long do your scapes/soils last? I found with mine a slight drop off after about a 1.5 yrs where I started to find growing some foreground plants more challenging.
Hi
Well spotted on both accounts, yep that is Lilaeopsis and
Eleocharis ssp. in the foreground, and it is growing quite nicely despite taking a hammering by being moved frequently. It hasn't really had chance to get established yet and put down roots, but it keeps putting out runners with little plantlets.
And yes the Hydrocotyle is missing, it was doing fine and kept on putting out new leaves. But I think it started to suffer from all the moves I put it through since some of the older leaves were starting to become covered in a fuzz of algae. But aside from that I didn't have room for it.
I have used peat on its own for years on end (in an Amazon biome) without any noticeable decline in plant growth, probably something to do with its high CEC and lots of well fed fish, but I haven't used any other combination for that long a period. I tend to get board easily and strip them down and set them up again afresh. I guess that's all part of the fun for me.
However, the soils I have recommended are largely composed of peat and/or have a high clay content with a naturally high CEC so they should retain enough nutrients to keep plants happy almost indefinitely. In other words, the rate of plant growth, though vigorous, should not be sufficient to outstrip soil nutrient replenishment. This should continue as long as water movement through the substrate is adequate enough to provide nutrient transference.