Good stuff - I always find its less painful and more productive asking for forgiveness than permission! 😂
But as usual I'm arriving late to the party... or maybe early for the next episode?
So now you've been vetoed on the giant iwagumi, what is the plan @Geoffrey Rea?
Ohh we do like to be beside the sea side... what you thinking, black water scape, or power driven algae farm... suspect you'll succeed with whatever you put the minds eye to 🥰There’s 200kg of stone and an eye watering amount of wood being gathered to play with. Five/six bags of soil, powder and Powersand
what you thinking, black water scape, or power driven algae farm...
suspect you'll succeed with whatever you put the minds eye to 🥰
There’s 200kg of stone and an eye watering amount of wood being gathered to play with. Five/six bags of soil, powder and Powersand.
Anyway… all in this time @Wookii
We’ll see if we can combine all the experience over the years into one setup. Truth be told, found this last scape to be a disappointment but it fitted in with the time constraints at the time. Never too late to try again.
😳 . . . is there going to to be any water in this scape? 😂
I think you're being a bit hard on yourself there, 99% of folks on here would be over the moon with that scape.
That said, it will be interesting to see you put yourself 'under the cosh' with something that's really going to test your skills!
Hmm.It’s simple really… Just looking for, ‘oh my gawd… did we really create that?!?’ every time you walk into the room 😂
<"Either this one"> or <"SpongeBob SquarePants">?It’s simple really… Just looking for, ‘oh my gawd… did we really create that?!?’ every time you walk into the room
Hmm.
That’s an interesting one…
I often think the best scapes are the ones where you can’t see a creators hand at all yet it’s the ones that are extremely literal that get all the whiz bang comments and you can see the artificially of it all in the work.
Is it a waterfall or does it make you think of waterfalls.
Hmm.
That’s an interesting one…
I often think the best scapes are the ones where you can’t see a creators hand at all yet it’s the ones that are extremely literal that get all the whiz bang comments and you can see the artificially of it all in the work.
Is it a waterfall or does it make you think of waterfalls.
It’s an interesting point. I think that’s what makes aquascaping so accessible. It is versatile and individual. You can create whatever you like, if you put your work forward in a public domain some will like what you do and others will not. Everyone has preferences and the longer I ‘do’ this hobby the more appreciative I’ve become of other styles. Whilst I cannot see myself wanting to live with certain styles I can appreciate the creativity and skill. I agree with you @Garuf that the ones that you can’t see a creators hand are often the best in the purist NA style as they look most natural and hit the; it makes you think of ‘the waterfall’ rather than replicating one. The stones and wood are positioned as it could in nature and the planting looks natural around it all. That is a personal preference though, and the NA style is still a style, just less contrived than say diorama.Don’t really know @Garuf . Was with @Ady34 and @Guest chatting about ‘where’ scapes come from, or what drives design.
Sure they’ll correct if this is wrong but Ady works from a concept, Tim with a clear idea of what he wants to see, myself ‘off the cuff’ in the moment from a feeling that may pop in whilst placing. Obviously the three aren’t mutually exclusive when putting something together but we all have preferences about the process.
I am hugely interested to see what you create @Geoffrey Rea, 200kg of stone 😱 With the wood also chosen already do you not have an idea of what you want to create or literally will you just pick them up and see what happens?
You are also creating a single viewpoint based scape, is this simply to challenge yourself or do you predominantly view this tank from a particular position so it makes sense to scape this way?
I work to a concept so that almost dictates my thought process, you are more free hardscaping but with other limitations in mind
I think that’s what makes aquascaping so accessible. It is versatile and individual. You can create whatever you like, if you put your work forward in a public domain some will like what you do and others will not. Everyone has preferences and the longer I ‘do’ this hobby the more appreciative I’ve become of other styles.
I will look forward to following progress and it was nice to put a face to the name the other week and have a matter about the hobby.
That goes for me too. The question often foremost in my mind when I'm scaping is... does it look natural and is it likely to occur through natural processes? Next question is… can I achieve a similar look with less hardscape? Less is often more.I agree with you @Garuf that the ones that you can’t see a creators hand are often the best in the purist NA style as they look most natural and hit the; it makes you think of ‘the waterfall’ rather than replicating one. The stones and wood are positioned as it could in nature’s and the planting looks natural around it all. That is a personal preference though, and the NA style is still a style, just less contrived than say diorama.
I pretty much always start out with a clear idea of the scape I want to create. Likewise there are considerations like angle of view, materials at my disposal, maintenance, and planting. However, I’m always open to the moment and the impulse of inspiration, so the creative process is fluid.Tim with a clear idea of what he wants to see, myself ‘off the cuff’ in the moment from a feeling that may pop in whilst placing.
Can’t wait to see your next artwork! 😉
Looking forward to what you come up with //emoji.tapatalk-cdn.com/emoji106.png
That first scape is/was still a masterpiece.