Hi all,
The advantage of a floating plant is that you can discount CO2 deficiency, any floating, or emergent, plant has access to <"
415 ppm of atmospheric CO2">. It is <"
Diana Walstad's "aerial advantage"> and have a look at <"
150 ppm co2?">.
I think so, I also think that light is probably more important than nutrients in terms of the degree of leginess.
This is the <
"https://www.ukaps.org/forum/threads/glasshouse-floating-weeds-tank.70267">. Which hasn't received a lot of nutrients, but has had a lot of light.
The situation is slightly complicated by the
Azolla caroliniana, because it has a <"
nitrogen fixing cyanobacterial symbiont">, and which will have supplied some "extra" fixed nitrogen.
If the
Salvinia auriculata group had more nutrients I would expect the shoots to be much longer before the basal leaves went brown (started senescing) and it would be a bigger plant all around and possibly slightly less "bronzy" in colour.
cheers Darrel