Thank you I will give these a watchSome interesting videos on the topic:
General Hardness (GH) Doesn't Really Matter In Shrimp Tanks
A Deep Dive Into General Hardness (GH) For Shrimp Tanks
Thank you I will give these a watchSome interesting videos on the topic:
General Hardness (GH) Doesn't Really Matter In Shrimp Tanks
A Deep Dive Into General Hardness (GH) For Shrimp Tanks
Thank you that's very helpfulThe quarter dose of ferts is a good idea too, but after a few weeks when the TDS of the tank has lowered you may have to up this a bit, depending on how the plants react, if there are any deficiencies etc.
For example the iron tends to precipitate out of the water so is less likely to build up than most of the other elements. You might not need to lower your iron dose.
I just tested it and it's around 280Out of interest what TDS value do you measure in your tap water before adding ferts etc?
You can feed your shrimps what ever you like. Do not expect any special effects from any food. The products from GlassGarten are certainly good. However, I don't use them myself.You might also consider starting to feed your shrimp specialist shrimp food that contains all the minerals they need to develop their exoskeleton and moult. GlassGarten do a range, such is mineral junkie bites.
You might also consider starting to feed your shrimp specialist shrimp food that contains all the minerals they need to develop their exoskeleton and moult
Since I live in a hard water area, I assumed (perhaps incorrectly) that I wouldn't need to consider mineral supplements. My local water report is on the first page of this thread and states my total hardness as CaCO3 is a mean value of 265 mg/l. The Alkalinity as CaCO3 is a mean value of 201 mg/l.I occasionally feed dried nettle leaves, for example. And I guess there are enough minerals in them
Usually, no further mineral additives are required in the feed. However, they won't do any harm either. Every shrimp feed probably contains all minerals.Since I live in a hard water area, I assumed (perhaps incorrectly) that I wouldn't need to consider mineral supplements. My local water report is on the first page of this thread and states my total hardness as CaCO3 is a mean value of 265 mg/l. The Alkalinity as CaCO3 is a mean value of 201 mg/l.
OK, I currently alternate between Glas Garten Shrimp Dinner 2 and Hikari Shrimp Cuisine every other day.Usually, no further mineral additives are required in the feed. However, they won't do any harm either. Every shrimp feed probably contains all minerals.
I've recently added a Cattapa leaf and a couple of alder conesDried leaves are always a good source of food for shrimps. The resulting biofilm is ideal food for shrimps
Your shrimp food is ok. Good brands, good food.OK, I currently alternate between Glas Garten Shrimp Dinner 2 and Hikari Shrimp Cuisine every other day.
Any oak, walnut or beech leaf does the same trick. Walnut in green, best harvested in summer.I've recently added a Cattapa leaf and a couple of alder cones
November was when I saw the first babies, and started to see a lot more over Christmas. The deaths started about two weeks ago.Do you recall when your population boomed? Til the recent deaths.
I really can't think of anything I changed before the deaths began. Something might occur to me but for now I can't think of one.Whats happened since or what have you changed/added to your routine?
This is incredibly helpful, thank you very much indeedRegarding the Ca:Mg ratio mentioned above. @Anomander is in hard water area of London. Water report lists Mg as 4.4 mg/l. Calcium is not listed but likely in the ballpark of 100 mg/l based on hardness value and what London water is like. The total Mg added per week via Epsom salt and TNC Complete is approx 3.5 mg/l and with 10% weekly water changes this will tend to stabilise at a maximum of 35 mg/l (in reality will be less as some is used by plants). Add the 4.4 from the water supply and we are at 39.4, lets call it 40, mg/l. Worst case scenario, Ca:Mg ratio is 2.5:1.
After a few weeks of lowered dose of Mg and 25% water changes the situation will be reset and I think it is safe to resume the 3.5 mg/l dose of magnesium. With regular 25% weekly water change and 3.5 ppm Mg addition the maximum it can reach is 4.4 + (3.5 x 4) = 18.4 mg/l. Which would be around 5:1 Ca:Mg ratio. Similarly after a few weeks it will likely be ideal to resume the original fert doses because with 25% water changes added "stuff" can only accumulate to a maximum of 4x the dose rather than 10x the dose with 10% water changes. Therefore it would be safe to resume the original fert and mineral regime after a few weeks, as long as there will be 25% per week water changes. If, on the other hand, you would rather do 10% water changes, then a lower fert dose would be needed. Long term you do not need to do both, just pick one, either up the water change amount to 25% and keep your original fert schedule or go back to 10% water change and reduce ferts/minerals.
I just tested it and it's around 280
DS of tap water with proportionate amount of weekly ferts/dechlorinator added is 303.
TDS of tank is 429. This seems high to me.
Thanks for this analysis, great stuff!OK, so:
Natural tap water = 280ppm
Amended tap water = 303ppm
Current tank water = 429ppm
Every week you are adding an additional (303-280) = 23 ppm TDS to the tank.
With 10% water changes you are only removing 2.3ppm of this addition every week.
If no minerals or ferts were consumed by plants and this continued for several months the total addition to TDS will be very close to 230ppm. Add that to the TDS of your tap water and we would have 510ppm. Obviously you have plants and they have been consuming some of the ions, but not all of them, and your TDS of 429 makes perfect sense to me in this situation.
Yeah. Gotta say I don't believe it. People love to talk about ratios but most biochemistry works on the basis of absolute concentrations and not ratios. You might need (making these numbers up) 0.4 uM Ca, and 0.1 uM Mg, but the ratio being 4:1 is neither here nor there. Have a look at enzyme kinetics for example... lots and lots of absolute concentration dependencies and no ratios at all.Due to the excessive addition of Mg, the Ca : Mg ratio has shifted in favour of Mg.
A favourable Ca : Mg ratio is 4:1 to 2:1.
With the proviso that I'm not interested in optimal plant growth and I'm not a plant physiologist, I tend to agree with this.People love to talk about ratios but most biochemistry works on the basis of absolute concentrations and not ratios.
In aquarium practice, ratios of calcium to magnesium of around 2:1 to 4:1 have proven to be effective. Both for plants and shrimps. It simplifies the whole thing considerably.Yeah. Gotta say I don't believe it. People love to talk about ratios but most biochemistry works on the basis of absolute concentrations and not ratios. ...
Fine. What is the optimal concentration of calcium?In aquarium practice, ratios of calcium to magnesium of around 2:1 to 4:1 have proven to be effective. Both for plants and shrimps. It simplifies the whole thing considerably.
That depends only on the dGH. And this depends on the available water. A very high dGH and therefore also a high dKH is not necessary, but is usually not harmful for shrimps. You can always lower the dGH with RO water oder rainwater if you want to.What is the optimal concentration of calcium?