The more I read and learn, the more I realise I need to read more and learn more!!
Perhaps Bradders, and a degree in Chemistry might help us all. But I can grow garden plants, house plants and plants in my fish tank without any real difficulty without fully understanding the intricacies of the chemistry, and indeed I can eat and drink and get nourishment on a limited understanding of the complexities of carbohydrates, liver function, insulin etc., I recommend the RHS website for a layperson's guide to fertiliser and signs of deficiency. Plants grow well in my two ponds without me doing anything at all, absolutely nothing except an autumn cut-back and a bit of a dredge of mud and leaves. I think the complexities of EI dosing explain why Walstad tanks have grown in popularity. Barr by the way does not obsess at all and suggests a range for a high light CO2 injected tank, not precise figures but 10-30 ppm Nitrate Phosphate 1-2 ppm and Potassium 10-30 ppm - careful use of any garden centre fertiliser should allow this range to be achieved - my only penny worth is that in hard water chelated Iron is important and my experience Phosphate can be as low as 0.5 ppm, assuming I have accurately measured it. Have a great day.the more I realise I need to read more and learn more
Some of it is just the legal requirement for horticultural fertilisers, the explanation and calculations are all here:<"percentage for dry fertilizers">. It doesn't now make a lot of sense, but it has been that way for a long time.The more I read and learn, the more I realise I need to read more and learn more!!
<"That is right">, the only real difference with aquariums (with livestock) is that we need to be a bit more wary of ammonia (NH3), just because of its <"toxicity to aquatic organisms">.But I can grow garden plants, house plants and plants in my fish tank without any real difficulty without fully understanding the intricacies of the chemistry
Tom is still a member of the forum (@plantbrain), and has been fairly active in the past. Although the Estimative and Duckweed Indices <"were developed independently">, they have <"some things in common"> and one of those is not obsessing too much about <"exact weights"> or ratios, hence the <"teaspoons"> as unit of measure.Barr by the way does not obsess at all and suggests a range for a high light CO2 injected tank, not precise figures
Absolutely Darrel, and a few years back I bought organic root sticks, far from ideal, lots of urea, but thankfully the pants mopped up any problems.Hi all,
<"That is right">, the only real difference with aquariums (with livestock) is that we need to be a bit more wary of ammonia (NH3), just because of its <"toxicity to aquatic organisms">.
Absolutely Darrel, and a few years back I bought organic root sticks, far from ideal, lots of urea, but thankfully the pants mopped up any problems.
That was partially why I became so focussed on <"dissolved oxygen">. In that particular circumstances CO2 wasn't implicated, but they were <"large fish with a high oxygen demand">.However, like most folks who have use CO2 I have had losses of fish, never that many, only larger heavier bodied fish, in hot weather.
As well as the <"asphyxiation issue">, I'd be the first to admit that I'm an incredibly lax with maintenance and a pretty poor and shoddy aquarist. If there was ever a <"recipe for disaster">? Mixing me and CO2 is one.I understand why you choose to not use CO2,
Point taken, I don't think anybody is arguing against that, added CO2 is definitely a game changer in harder, more alkaline water.but in the early 1990s I found it transformed my success with plants in London,
Thank-you and the same to you.Have a lovely evening
Thanks as always DarrelHi all,
That was partially why I became so focussed on <"dissolved oxygen">. In that particular circumstances CO2 wasn't implicated, but they were <"large fish with a high oxygen demand">.
As well as the <"asphyxiation issue">, I'd be the first to admit that I'm an incredibly lax with maintenance and a pretty poor and shoddy aquarist. If there was ever a <"recipe for disaster">? Mixing me and CO2 is one.
Point taken, I don't think anybody is arguing against that, added CO2 is definitely a game changer in harder, more alkaline water.
Thank-you and the same to you.
cheers Darrel
I might manage a week. A timer plug makes a lot more sense.I am intrigued by ADA in their gallery manually raising lily pipes at night to ensure adequate oxygen levels. I wouldn't have the discipline myself.
It shouldn't be so much of an issue in planted tanks, just because of the net oxygen production of plants, but night-time is always the dangerous time. If you don't have plants? It is always night.But an old GP friend in Kent - hard water, usual story - insisted on having an air pump and air stone on a timer for nighttime safety, he used to joke with me, an asthmatic, that night time breathing problems are common.
I think that is a good idea, it gives you belt and braces and peace of mind.I now myself am thinking that next time I go on holiday abroad I will check the weather at home and tell my son to switch on a pre-installed air pump and air stone on my main tank. In the last dozen or so years, I have twice had a few losses - mainly barbs - when temperatures in the UK have been in the high 20s to low 30s.
I think that is a good idea, it gives you belt and braces and peace of mind.
Darrel got me hooked on the Dissolved Oxygen journey - his enthusiasm is just that infectious. I bought a DO meter and started taking readings, and I could see how, during the day, you get a lot DO from the plants, and then you will lose a lot overnight - a couple of mg/l in some cases. As a result, I remain a keen advocate of aerating my aquariums 24/7. I, too, have seen my kitchen tank get very hot (bad placement) in summer and reach the 29C range, but never lost any of the 30 fish to which, in part, is down to keeping it well aerated.I now myself am thinking that next time I go on holiday abroad I will check the weather at home and tell my son to switch on a pre-installed air pump and air stone on my main tank. In the last dozen or so years, I have twice had a few losses - mainly barbs - when temperatures in the UK have been in the high 20s to low 30s.
Thanks for that, I always in the past managed to keep a tank cooler, but in this long, and thin house, with lots of windows, all very cheerful in the autumn and spring, but in the summer, things get problematic. A dark alcove is really a bonus. For the coming summer, 2025, the passing of the years shocks me, first proper aquarium, 1969, I will go back to a pump and air stone, but night time only I think for me, except in exceptional temperatures. Most barbs hate it too hot anyway regardless of DO. But fatalities are unacceptable if avoidable.Darrel got me hooked on the Dissolved Oxygen journey - his enthusiasm is just that infectious. I bought a DO meter and started taking readings, and I could see how, during the day, you get a lot DO from the plants, and then you will lose a lot overnight - a couple of mg/l in some cases. As a result, I remain a keen advocate of aerating my aquariums 24/7. I, too, have seen my kitchen tank get very hot (bad placement) in summer and reach the 29C range, but never lost any of the 30 fish to which, in part, is down to keeping it well aerated.
I'm definitely not a botanist, so proper names are not in my gift, commonly named stag horn algae is however, my suggestion/best guess
Thank you both. Yes, that was my inclination, too, that it was stag horn algae.It looks exactly like staghorn algae.
You still need a little more biology. That takes time. You can encourage the biology a little by adding a little forest or garden soil or preferably fresh compost to the tank. Half a teaspoon is enough.Something does not feel right to me, and I am sure its not just because the tank is only 3 months old.