easerthegeezer said:
This makes a lot of sense clive and would have been my first assumption had it not been for reading a thread about anubia rot and the posibility of legislation to stop them coming into this country, that and a friends anubias all rotting though right after purchase. So i guess i may have been guilty of jumping to conclusions 🙁
Well, yeah, I mean, this is why Planet Earth gets so screwed up. Someone wants to make a law to strop anubias import because people don't know how to take care of the plant? Outrageous. I suppose the next thing is to stop importation of Crypts, because they melt right? It's already being referred to as "Cryptocoryne disease". After that, they'll stop importation of Ferns because of "Black Spot" disease and "Translucent Tip" disease, right? How about "Hole in Leaf" disease? Maybe even "Falling Lower Leaves" disease. Here's the medicine for all those diseases; Turn the little needle valve anti-clockwise...
easerthegeezer said:
So would i right in saying that a system is never 'stable' and will need constant trimming of co2 as plant mass increases and decreases? or does a tank reach a plant density level that the co2 can be left alone at its safe maximum?
Well, all high energy CO2 enriched tanks require attention. The more energy we add the more attention we have to pay, hence the allure of low energy non-enriched tanks. Depending on lighting, adding CO2 can cause somewhere up to a 2500% increase in growth rates. Even just adding liquid carbon can cause a 300% increase. Imagine driving a car sedately on a "B" road and then increasing your speed by 2500%. Will it require more attention? Now when you add more CO2 everything will grow faster and this now requires more cleaning and more trimming, so it's kind of like feeding the monster.
People assume that adding CO2 solves all your problems, but this is not true. It's just the beginning of your problems, and so CO2 tanks always have to be carefully managed. The source of this misconception is that when viewing a beautiful scape, you always see data such as what kind of light, what kind of ferts, what kind of glass (opti-this or opti-that), what was the inspiration and so forth, but nobody ever asks "How much work was it?" "How many times did you screw it up?" You never see that kind of data. No one wants to hear that, yet anyone who has a high energy tank has to work hard at it.
I suppose these issues can be mitigated by careful selection of the plant types as well as reducing the PAR.
Cheers,