LondonAquascaper
Member
They may not have dirt in them, but will have nitrifying bacteria in them.
Yeah, but in that case, why use foam - you'd be way better off filling that basket with a quality filter media.
They may not have dirt in them, but will have nitrifying bacteria in them.
Hi all,
Yes I'm only really interested in oxygen, it is <"the prime metric in biological filtration">.
Have a look at Aquarium Science, the planted pages are <"interesting">, but he is very good <"on biological filtration">.
View attachment 179139
Yes it <"certainly can">, that is one advantage of Kaldnes type floating cell media, they are <"designed to shed excess biofilm">. We don't need the <"thick and sticky biofilms"> that might be advantageous in heavily stocked non-planted situations.
cheers Darrel
It does, but one thing you have to bear in mind is that the author of Aquarium Science has <"insane stocking rates">.Wouldn't that put the ceramic media last in the test?
A lot of <"Monster Fishkeepers use pot scrubbies">, mainly because of their non-clog nature.Those pot scrubbers sound good as ive heard them being used before. Cant get any cheaper either.
That is the real issue, <"no scientific data"> and a lot of statements that are <"dubious at best">. I just use <"whatever I have to hand">, it all "works" and once you know that it is oxygen that is the important bit everything else is just <"re-arranging the deck-chairs on the the Titanic">.A lot of it seems to be marketing hype.
I'd say foam can be a <"quality filter media">. The <"majority of serious fish-keepers">, who have fish-houses, use an air pump, air ring and foam filtration.why use foam - you'd be way better off filling that basket with a quality filter media.
Yes I'd agree the planted tank pages are <"interesting">, but the pages on aquarium filtration are (in my opinion) pretty good. I've done some work on the <"bioremediation of landfill leachate"> so I have some scientific understanding of the processes involved.are we taking Aquarium Science at his word...... I'm highly dubious of that site!
I do have some issues, I've just looked at the <"Biohome media page"> and it says:
"Please note: Tanks with heavy stock and feeding (e.g. cichlid, goldfish, predator or fry tanks) and marine tanks may require 1.5kg - 2kg per 100 litres to achieve the full cycle filtration which will result in the reduction of nitrates. Do not worry about plant growth being affected in a tank which reads zero nitrates - the nitrate is processed into soluble nitrogen which is easily used by plants, boosting their growth."
Which would ring all sorts of alarm bells for me.
How do you define quality media?Yeah, but in that case, why use foam - you'd be way better off filling that basket with a quality filter media.
Hi all,
It does, but one thing you have to bear in mind is that the author of Aquarium Science has <"insane stocking rates">.
A lot of <"Monster Fishkeepers use pot scrubbies"> it is because of their non-clog nature.
That is the real issue, <"no scientific data"> and a lot of statements that are <"dubious at best">. I just use <"whatever I have to hand">, it all "works" and once you know that it is oxygen that is the important bit everything else is just <"re-arranging the deck-chairs on the the Titanic">
I'd say foam can be a <"quality filter media">. The <"majority of serious fish-keepers">, who have fish-houses, use an air pump, air ring and foam filtration.
Yes I'd agree the planted tank pages are <"interesting">, but the pages on aquarium filtration are (in my opinion) pretty good. I've done some work on the <"bioremediation of landfill leachate"> so I have some scientific understanding of the processes involved.
If you are asking me whether his opinion, or that of <"Stephan Tanner">, <"Timothy Hovanec"> etc are more likely to be right than that of the <"vendor of Biohome?"> I would say they definitely are.
cheers Darrel
I honestly don't think it matters that much what you use. If some-one else is buying I'll have <"Eheim Coco-pops">, mainly because they aren't made of plastic and will last eternally. If I'm buying my own? Generic Kaldnes type floating cell media, <"Alfagrog or Hydroleca">.basically that we should just fill our entire filter with foam?
Yeah well its an interesting question. Why are HMF successful when they don't seem to function as typical biological media do ie your k1, and ceramics etc.Interesting, what is the long and short of the research then - basically that we should just fill our entire filter with foam?
I bought a few of those pool filter sponges, and inserted a cheap filter. I cut them in half then block off the other end with some fine pad. I have one running in a small shrimp tank, and it works great.Hi all,
In recent times I've mainly used the <"Koi type drilled sponges">, they are cheap and they work effectively.
cheers Darrel
Where do you get those then? I’ve been looking for some with a large enough hole to accommodate my 25mm intake pipe.I bought a few of those pool filter sponges,
I found them on Amazon. Just search for 'pool filter sponge'.Where do you get those then? I’ve been looking for some with a large enough hole to accommodate my 25mm intake pipe.
It is different for HMF (and trickle filters etc.). In a canister type filter <"a finite amount of oxygen"> enters the filter and it can only be replenished as new water flows in.Yeah well its an interesting question. Why are HMF successful when they don't seem to function as typical biological media do ie your k1, and ceramics etc.