G
Guest
Guest
I know it's mad isn't it. The SAA don't need the likes of Graham Hancock to challenge them, they seem to be doing a good job of discrediting their own organisation themselves. But it does make you wonder how seriously they are taking him and his claims and whether there is any validity to them.
Conspiracy theories aside, it does make you wonder what vested interests are so determined to maintain the status quo they feel compelled to respond at all, let alone in that manor. It's like new fangled scientific ideas challenging the ideology of the church during the European Renaissance of the 15th and 16th centuries. Okay maybe a little overstated but similar in a watered down kind of way, perhaps.
Conspiracy theories aside, it does make you wonder what vested interests are so determined to maintain the status quo they feel compelled to respond at all, let alone in that manor. It's like new fangled scientific ideas challenging the ideology of the church during the European Renaissance of the 15th and 16th centuries. Okay maybe a little overstated but similar in a watered down kind of way, perhaps.