No you shouldn't, plants don't require much Mg (although there might be problems with Mg++ uptake where you have very high levels of Ca++ ions). The mix might be a bit nitrogen poor.Would I need extra Magnesium and Phosphate?
I don't believe every case has been falsified. IMO you use a perverse logic in your reasoning.Every case has been falsified.
I don't believe every case has been falsified. IMO you use a perverse logic in your reasoning.
According to your logic:
If someone claims that the algae growth is related to the eleveted levels of nutrients, it is sufficient to find just one tank where this claim does not hold true (i.e. tank with elevated levels of nutriens and no visible algae), and the claim is thus falsified.
According to the same logic:
If someone claims that the algae growth is not related to the eleveted levels of nutrients, it is sufficient to find just one tank where this claim does not hold true (i.e. tank with elevated levels of nutriens and a lot of visible algae), and the claim is thus falsified.
So based on the same perverse logic I can easily falsify most of your claims.
So if you are waiting for this kind of arguments I'm afraid you'll wait for ages, without seeing your error.
What if hundreds or thousands of people (+ great many scientists) have also noted clear correlation between elevated nutrient levels and algae?What if dozen's of people have also noted no correlation between elevated nutrient level's and algae?
What if hundreds or thousands of people (+ great many scientists) have also noted clear correlation between elevated nutrient levels and algae?
Hundreds of thousands can grow algae through lack of maintenance!What if hundreds or thousands of people (+ great many scientists) have also noted clear correlation between elevated nutrient levels and algae?
Or perhaps your explanation of the "cause and consequence" is not correct.Perhaps their nutrient level's far exceed that which we add to our aquarium's .
Perhaps their nutrient level's are comprised of too much organic matter rather than inorganic mineral salt's we use.
Perhaps their bodies of nutrient rich water do not get removed and replaced with fresh water on weekly basis.
Perhaps they receive too much light,poor CO2 availablility.
Why are you so imperious here? It's no "life or death" issue so take it easy. Or do you have no solid arguments, so you are trying to shout your opinion out to make it more valid? I say that the logic Tom uses for the falsification is twisted. I used the same logic to get a totaly different results. You did not show me any valid argument that proves this logic is correct. Instead you try to convince me that the result is correct. But I say nothing against the result (which doesn't mean I agree with it). I just use your own arguments against you to show you that they are not valid.Hundreds of thousands can grow algae through lack of maintenance!
Tom Barr can grow multitudes of healthy plants with elevated Potassium fertilizer's but he does constant and regular water changes,in depth cleaning and even more important scrutinises his tanks every day!!!
Agree. You can take some people by the hand and show them how algae are formed in a tank with plants + light + nutrients, and they'll still fail to recognize it and keep speculating why it should not be true (organics, NH4, low maintenance, low CO2 ... bad planet, wrong galaxy).Perhaps it is easier to be a scientist than for many to successfully run a planted tank sans algae.🙄
You could/can take some people by the hand and show em,and they will still fail.