Welcome to my world for the last 15 years 😀
Do not become cynical though.
Have mercy and be compassionate to them personally.
Stick to reason and the topic.
Look for solutions that answer the question, not banter and personal attacks.
One thing to also consider, while you know you may never convince them of the reasoning, other folks read the web and read the logic. So your audience is much larger than the two people going at each other.
Yes, there is a lot of hypocritical comments.
The issue with plants and algae in aquariums is not a big issue for folks in the Scientific community 😉
So you are not going to find much there.
You need to know how to use such peer review articles and apply them in support of your observations, test and then see for yourself.
I suggest the Socratic method.
Do not convince me, I merely ask the questions that will lead you down the path that will make you question your own ideas and thoughts.
You ultimately must convince yourself of the logic.
"Belief" is a poor method and I do not suggest folks do that.
As far as research papers, Bachmann's are well known. Very nice guy.
Regarding PMDD: what Paul and Kevin initially went with was a good foundation and approach.
But they did not test the very hypothesis they proposed :!:
So they got nailed.
If you make a hypothesis, it must be tested to see if it's true or not don't you think?
Thus every hypothesis must be "falsifiable".
If you test it and cannot come to any reasonable conclusion, or cannot falsify it, then you tenatively accept it unless you figure out some other way to disprove it.
You keep picking at it again and again.
Leave no stone unturned.
But such approaches do not answer why you get algae, only what it cannot possibly be due to.
Many folks assume testing something will show "cause". This is very difficult, and there be several/many causes and interdependent realtionships(light, CO2 and NH4, O2, fish loading, current etc).
However, we can test one thing at a time easily.
But the folks that ask and demand "proof", research etc, they often do not even have a control for the experiment(what might that be for planted tanks?), to work from, very poor testing skills, no clue how to set up the test to answer the question to begin with.
All basic stuff to go forth and ask and learn about the issue.
I spent a lot of time measuring PO4, light, CO2 etc.
I got good at it.
Still, even folks with little test skills, knowledge about all the baloney, can still grow plant well by looking at the plants and adding ferts.
Just good observation alone and that's my personal background prior to all this.
Ironic really.
Regards,
Tom Barr