Hi all,
George this is not a good example for beginners. 🙂
So how you choose the fish without knowing what your water is?
I think that is a relevant point regarding soft and hard water fish. You can get parameters for hardness from your water supplier in the UK.
Further, most hobby test kits are blunt instruments and not really that accurate.
That is the real problem for me. I'm not anti-testing, quite the opposite I'd really like to know what the water parameters are in my tanks, but to get accurate, repeatable values is really difficult for a lot of parameters, even with lab scale kit and a lot of time.
I started from the premise that I was going to have a planted tank that was "over-filtered". The difficulties with water testing were why I started using tank management techniques that didn't require testing, but could use plant health and growth rate as an indicator of nutrient status. I also knew that the prime metric for biological filtration was oxygen availability, and that "plant/microbe" filtration systems were a lot more flexible and resilient than "microbe alone" filters. The only dip meter, or quick test, that I could find that gave accurate repeatable values over a large range of water conditions was a conductivity meter, so I used that to give me a datum point for my tank water. It isn't the most useful value, but it was the best I could do.
Because I wanted to take CO2 and PAR out of the equation I choose a floating plant as my indicator of nutrient status. Initially I used Duckweed (
Lemna minor) and called it the "Duckweed Index". After a bit of experimentation I found that Amazon Frogbit (
Limnobium laevigatum) was an improved Duckweed (
Lemna doesn't grow well in soft water and yellows, even when nutrients are available), and I recommend this as my floater.
I know I'm biased, but the "Duckweed Index" is a much better method of tank management than water testing which can lead to chasing the "ideal water" pH values etc. The method is the simple for beginners. You plant a tank with low tech plants, including a floater, you leave the plants to grow in, and then you add the fish. You take conductivity readings during the set up process when the tank is growing well, and then you use a mixture of tap and RO (or rain-water, I use rain-water), to keep your conductivity readings somewhere near those values.
You might not get the result George has achieved (the tank is a triumph), but you will get a stable, resilient tank.
There is a more complete description in <"
Setting up empty tank.......">.
And densely planted biologically stable tanks are well documented, albeit anecdotally, to absorb metabolic wastes very efficiently. So water changes aren't always needed on a regular basis.
I think that is true to some degree, and I definitely like dense planting.
Personally I change a small volume of water on a regular basis (usually about 10% a day), but that probably is more than is necessary.
cheers Darrel