Hi all,
*Modification of sediment redox potential by three contrasting macrophytes: implications for phosphorus adsorption/desorption
cheers Darrel
unfortunately, practically nobody studies aquarium sediments in this detail,
No, it is a shame <"Could it be the substrate? Tank in terminal decline...">.Perhaps the biggest problem is that you can't earn any money with studies on aquariums.
Probably the most information on this can be found in the literature on wetland or rice sediments
Personally, I've lent heavily on <"Rice (Oryza sativa) culture"> and <"constructed wetlands"> (for <"wastewater remediation">) for information.Perhaps the biggest problem is that you can't earn any money with studies on aquariums. With studies on rice fields, you can at least expect a certain amount of harvest.
I think aquatic plants are still altering the composition of the rhizosphere microbiome to facilitate nutrient uptake, basically roots are just leaky structures. Originally the <"Duckweed Index"> actually used an emergent plant <"Why a rooted emergent plant would have been optimal">, rather than a floating one. It had to be a plant with access to atmospheric gases, so "emergent" or "floating" were really the only options.In an aquatic environment, the acids secreted by the roots would immediately become so diluted that they would not be effective enough.
With hind sight having a <"floating plant as my nutrient indicator"> was actually a massive advantage, due to the complex, multifactorial nature of what happens in the substrate. It allowed me to concentrate on the water column and the advantage of that is that every tank has water.In addition, aquarium sediments are highly variable. Even when it comes to the substrate, there are practically endless possibilities.
We have a few posts on <"Radial Oxygen Loss">, you know it is important when you see the root / rhizome architecture of Nelumbo (below) etc. or the Typha sp. in your linked journal* <"Modification of sediment redox potential by three contrasting macrophytes: implications for phosphorus adsorption/desorption">.Thus, in flooded sediments, iron and manganese are unlikely to be deficient; rather, they are toxic. Plants counteract this excess by excreting oxygen from their roots.
We've talked about this in terms of iron (Fe) being a two edged sword, with the two "edges" being <"deficiency"> and <"toxicity">.This results in the oxidation of the reduced iron (and manganese), which often results in a rusty colour of the roots (called „iron plaque“ => Iron plaque formation on roots of wetland plants).
*Modification of sediment redox potential by three contrasting macrophytes: implications for phosphorus adsorption/desorption
cheers Darrel