Re: Lily Pipes V Sprinkle Bar "UP DATE" & Current status
Current status: there is a definite difference in water movement within the tank I can only assume this is due to the extension on the OEM spray bar I do not have any carpeting plants yet, there are some crypt and their leaves are moving very slightly. The bars are positioned approx. 1.5" to 2" below the water surface and are at an angle of 80 degrees, there is a very light displacement on the water surface. There are plenty of tiny Co2 bubble being emitted from the bar - but the majority of the bubbles are rising rather than around the tank. My personnel view is I have defeated the purpose of the bar. A different view to determine the length of the bar is: that Ehiem do numerous tests prior to releasing their products to the public and I can only assume that to obtain the correct water displacement is to use the spray bar supplied, by adding an additional length reduced the overall performance and this is what i am doing / seeing. Back to the drawing board. Pic's attached.
Regards
paul.
ceg4048 said:Hi Paul,
Good or bad depends on whether you are able to get flow down to the substrate and whether you have achieved a nice circular current. Do the majority of the plants gently wave in the current? Can you see flow across the carpet plants? Have you positioned the spray pattern as I demonstrated in earlier threads such that the exit flow direction is horizontal? Have you placed the bar near the surface to generate a nice surface ripple? If you reduce the exit flow velocity too so that the answers to most of these questions is "no" then you've defeated the purpose and utility of the spraybar.
Cheers,
Current status: there is a definite difference in water movement within the tank I can only assume this is due to the extension on the OEM spray bar I do not have any carpeting plants yet, there are some crypt and their leaves are moving very slightly. The bars are positioned approx. 1.5" to 2" below the water surface and are at an angle of 80 degrees, there is a very light displacement on the water surface. There are plenty of tiny Co2 bubble being emitted from the bar - but the majority of the bubbles are rising rather than around the tank. My personnel view is I have defeated the purpose of the bar. A different view to determine the length of the bar is: that Ehiem do numerous tests prior to releasing their products to the public and I can only assume that to obtain the correct water displacement is to use the spray bar supplied, by adding an additional length reduced the overall performance and this is what i am doing / seeing. Back to the drawing board. Pic's attached.
Regards
paul.