DSLR or Bridge?

bigmatt

Member
Joined
18 Mar 2010
Messages
676
Location
Castleford, West Yorks.
Hello all,
I'm thinking about upgrading my point and shoot camera for something a bit better. I'm on a limited budget and a photography beginner, but for taking good pics of family and decent tank shots which do folk think would be better and do people have any recommendations and/or examples of pics taken with different cameras. Budget at most is going to be around the £300 mark (if i can get the overtime in!) and i'm looking to buy in a couple of months hopefully. Don't have a prolem with used/refurb gear, as long as it comes with a warranty of some sort
Thanks as always,
Matt
 

Tom

Member
Joined
8 Sep 2007
Messages
2,633
Location
Kawanabe, Kagoshima, Japan 鹿児島県南九州市川辺町
Yep, fantastic compact camera. I don't see the point of bridge cameras, it's just unnecessary bulk. You either want something small and compact for the pocket, or you don't mind the extra bit of weight for a DSLR. I'd love a G11 or similar - my walkaround camera at the moment is up to 2kg of 5D+lens.
 

bigmatt

Member
Joined
18 Mar 2010
Messages
676
Location
Castleford, West Yorks.
What if i didn't mind the extra bit of weight? I plan on keeping the compact we have for just carrying about. IS there a good budget DSLR choice? Thanks for the rapid reply as well!
M
 

spyder

Member
Joined
7 Mar 2011
Messages
1,020
Entering the SLR market is more like buying into a system. Go hold a few at your local Jessops and see which feels better for you. You can then go check the technical reviews to help make a decision.

I went with the Canon EOS 400D a few years back and it's served me very well.
 

aaronnorth

Member
Joined
19 Feb 2008
Messages
3,953
Location
worksop, nottinghamshire
I had a Fujifilm Finepix S5700 Bridge (£88) and it gave me good results, it was just limiting when you wanted to try something a bit different, and it can be frustrating in aquarium photography as you are limitied to ISO400 (due to noise any higher) which makes for a slow shutter speed - unless of course you have extra lighting!

3886877026_8d99753aab.jpg
DSCF0329 by A.North1, on Flickr
3757242155_5c17bcc68a.jpg
Hatchet Fish by A.North1, on Flickr
3287308605_4cd1acb059.jpg
Bristlenose plec by A.North1, on Flickr

However I upgraded to a Canon 350D (£240 second hand) and it makes photography much more enjoyable as it is so easy to use, you can pu half the effort in and get the same quality as the bridge. Focusing is much quicker so you get those shots that you would usually miss.

4898333096_db16e4ea60.jpg
IMG_9060 by A.North1, on Flickr
4898327122_f0c6bfa195.jpg
IMG_9026 by A.North1, on Flickr
4894463990_3debb2dcd2.jpg
Sealife - Brighton by A.North1, on Flickr

Have a look on my Flickr account for more examples, as you can see there is just that bit more sharpness in the SLR, and the better balance of lighting.
The Nikon

Thanks, Aaron
 

bigmatt

Member
Joined
18 Mar 2010
Messages
676
Location
Castleford, West Yorks.
thanks for the replies and great pics. I've noticed a few people making happy noises about the Canon SLRs. To flip it on it's head are there any particular models/brands to avoid? Thanks again,Matt
 

spyder

Member
Joined
7 Mar 2011
Messages
1,020
I spent a bit of time looking around when I decided to grab a DSLR. I researched lenses, prices, availability of accessories etc. It is an important decision when you start investing in glass. You change, you change your glass too.

I'm not a big Canon over Nikon man, there's probably very little in it at entry level. I just went with what offered what I needed and what felt comfortable when I played in Jessops. :D
 

bigmatt

Member
Joined
18 Mar 2010
Messages
676
Location
Castleford, West Yorks.
it'll be a while until i buy! Need a visit from the money fairy first! I'm leaning towards a Canon SLR but i need to go to a camera shop and play. And like all real men i need to get permission from my wife first! M
 

bigmatt

Member
Joined
18 Mar 2010
Messages
676
Location
Castleford, West Yorks.
that's good to know - i'll have a look tomorrow! Being as i know NOWT about this SLR game a couple more questions ... what's good for a beginners all round lens, and can anyone recommend a good book as a starting point? Thanks again, Matt
 

George Farmer

Founder
Staff member
Joined
30 Jun 2007
Messages
7,068
Location
Cambridgeshire
bigmatt said:
that's good to know - i'll have a look tomorrow! Being as i know NOWT about this SLR game a couple more questions ... what's good for a beginners all round lens, and can anyone recommend a good book as a starting point? Thanks again, Matt
Hi Matt

The supplied 18-55mm VR lens is a good starting point. The build quality isn't great, but sufficient for your requirements. The Nikon 18-55 is also a very sharp lens - better than the equivalent Canon.

18mm is good for wide angle shots i.e. landscapes, funky portraits and increased depth-illusion aquascapes...
55mm is great for portraits.

This book will be a good starting point - http://www.amazon.co.uk/Nikon-D3000-Sna ... 089&sr=1-3

The net has thousands of great articles on photography. Join a forum and check out the pinned threads for a good introduction.

This is a good one - http://photography-on-the.net/forum/sho ... p?t=414088

The Canon 1000D is another option, but if I had £300 I'd go for the Nikon (even though I'm a Canon user myself).

Perhaps the biggest advantage Canon have over Nikon is their better lens selection, but this really isn't an issue for most of us.
 

nayr88

Member
Joined
4 Feb 2010
Messages
2,080
After reading this thread I've been thinking about taking the hit and buying a nice quality slr. I went into a shop and saw the 1000d for around that price and was really tempted. I just don't want to buy cheap crap or overpriced cap :) and end up buying twice...and no on had mentioned the 1000d.

When looking through starts of cameras and comparing them, what's the important are the imported things other than price and mega pixels?
Cheers

Sorry to hijac, I'm sure it'll benefit you thread anyways :)
 
Top