Snapped some more photos. And I’m wondering if potassium is in excess and when I say excess I mean that it is extremely out of proportion to everything else.
look at this Ludwigia repens:
The leaves are actually good and tough but they are wavy. Could the potassium be inhibiting the uptake of calcium?
Look at this rotala:
One out of every 10 looks like this - I also noticed it does this and spurts our several healthy new shoots .
BUT:
You can see in the centre there that two of the side shots have also started to crunch but none of the others have.
I thought the rotala just did this in response to sending off side shoots - not the other way round.
I mentioned that my water changes adds at least 30 ppm of potassium to my tank.
I dose magnesium daily maybe 2 ish ppm. So it makes sense that calcium would be the lower and that is the deficiency that is shown?
hmmm ... I think removing my mineralization to tap water (which increases KH (about 2 degrees) GH (15 calcium, 5 magnesium) potassium (about 30ppm) and just using that water for water change might be a good idea.
in many ways, this idea is grounded in the fact that we can apply Mulder’s chart to aquatic plants and that my case is very extreme.
Leave co2/daily dose of ferts/light constant and just change my water change water.
I’d love and appreciate some guidance here.
Oh:
here is pogo
Looks great.
Thought: Ludwigia and rotala are easy plants - does easy mean that they “require” less nutrients, so having such excess then they are used to will cause odd behaviours?
look at this Ludwigia repens:
The leaves are actually good and tough but they are wavy. Could the potassium be inhibiting the uptake of calcium?
Look at this rotala:
One out of every 10 looks like this - I also noticed it does this and spurts our several healthy new shoots .
BUT:
You can see in the centre there that two of the side shots have also started to crunch but none of the others have.
I thought the rotala just did this in response to sending off side shoots - not the other way round.
I mentioned that my water changes adds at least 30 ppm of potassium to my tank.
I dose magnesium daily maybe 2 ish ppm. So it makes sense that calcium would be the lower and that is the deficiency that is shown?
hmmm ... I think removing my mineralization to tap water (which increases KH (about 2 degrees) GH (15 calcium, 5 magnesium) potassium (about 30ppm) and just using that water for water change might be a good idea.
in many ways, this idea is grounded in the fact that we can apply Mulder’s chart to aquatic plants and that my case is very extreme.
Leave co2/daily dose of ferts/light constant and just change my water change water.
I’d love and appreciate some guidance here.
Oh:
here is pogo
Looks great.
Thought: Ludwigia and rotala are easy plants - does easy mean that they “require” less nutrients, so having such excess then they are used to will cause odd behaviours?