If you read all of this then I apologise for the incoherent rambling and any grammar/spelling mistakes I may have made, and thank you for reading
Hi @Hufsa
I wish my Norwegian was as good as your English!
JPC 🙂
If you read all of this then I apologise for the incoherent rambling and any grammar/spelling mistakes I may have made, and thank you for reading
Absolutely 🙂With some guidance and care this shouldnt be a problem though. Just because you empty out some muck doesnt mean you have to squeeze and beat the living crap out of your sponges or pressure wash your bio media.
Absolutely 🙂With some guidance and care this shouldnt be a problem though. Just because you empty out some muck doesnt mean you have to squeeze and beat the living crap out of your sponges or pressure wash your bio media.
Is the BBA increasing as though it likes current conditions or did it all come at the same time ...
Speaking of trigger did the outbreak come before or after you changed your light around? I’m a little confused what you are running right now - temporary LEDs or the final Fluval solution?
Eventually it may all detach. We don't know why, but it has an alternation of generations, and that may be the reason.My understanding of BBA is it will remain until you remove it and on hardscape that will need a very stiff brush.
I think if you can cite your exact light spec and height above substrate plus find some PAR values for it running at 33% we (and by “we” I really mean wiser folks on this forum because I’ve zero experience of this) can try and see if you are in an acceptable range for your choice of plants in a low tech tank.
So the light is the Fluval 3.0 Plant, size 91-122 cm long.
From the light to the water surface is 6 cm, and from water surface to substrate it is approx 36 cm.
So a total of 42 cm from the light to the substrate.
I do know that the 91 cm uses 46 W and has 3300 lumens,
while the 122-153 cm uses 59 W and has 4250 lumens.
Maybe a scale can be extrapolated from this?
Quote from post:
Depth.........PAR
3".................545
6".................270
12"...............113
18"...............71
What power are you running it on?
...
The main risk of removing the Eheim is the effect on flow.
Im running the light at 30% now, but it was on 100% up until just recently.
... Does it looks familiar? From distance (and if light is not confusing me) you may have long term Fe deficiency on P. Helferi