samc
Member
- Joined
- 28 Oct 2008
- Messages
- 1,378
hi all
this is something i have been thinking about lately. it may sound strange but i hope you understand.
why do we use large rocks in nanos in comparison to the size of the tank? they look really good but have never seen anyone use the same thing scaled up. stuworrall has a great example of his latest nano. its awsome. but if anyone did the same thing in a 60cm cube would they think your crazy? another example is the ada gallery nanos. they have 2 or 3 rocks which fill the tank. and i love them
here you see the ada nanos
i have never seen this type of scape scaled up such as in a 60cm. why do we only use stones that go half the height of the aquarium in bigger tanks where as in a the photo the first one goes to the water surface.
can anyone understand what i am saying???
this is something i have been thinking about lately. it may sound strange but i hope you understand.
why do we use large rocks in nanos in comparison to the size of the tank? they look really good but have never seen anyone use the same thing scaled up. stuworrall has a great example of his latest nano. its awsome. but if anyone did the same thing in a 60cm cube would they think your crazy? another example is the ada gallery nanos. they have 2 or 3 rocks which fill the tank. and i love them
here you see the ada nanos
i have never seen this type of scape scaled up such as in a 60cm. why do we only use stones that go half the height of the aquarium in bigger tanks where as in a the photo the first one goes to the water surface.
can anyone understand what i am saying???