As no references apart from a few wikipedia pages are given (apparently the author discovered all himself) it’s hard to say where things broke apart. So just assume failure in copypasta from some uncredited work
This seems unnecessarily harsh, if you have issues with the article why not share them so they can be discussed? Talking about someone in a roundabout way is rarely conducive to a productive discussionI’ll keep my opinion about the rest of the article to myself and leave to the readers and moderators to compare to the standard set by other excellent articles found on this nice forum, such as Ceg’s EI articles published 14 years ago.