Andrew Butler
Member
I think I agree here - I could be wrong!The top one is how it is meant to be
Did they have a picture with the packaging of it fitted?
I think I agree here - I could be wrong!The top one is how it is meant to be
The top one is how it is meant to be but the one on the bottom would be great for blind cave fish!
Very nice 🙂
Where did you get it from?
I prefer it upside down for a planted tank.
Right way up looks more like a cave scene for blind cave fish. Very dramatic, but not so natural for an above-ground scene.
Haha, not blind cave fish https://www.ukaps.org/forum/threads/blind-cave-fish.34869/page-2#post-382750 🙄The top one is how it is meant to be but the one on the bottom would be great for blind cave fish!
I think I agree here - I could be wrong!
Did they have a picture with the packaging of it fitted?
The top one gives the most realistic depth perseption..🙂 Slowly stepping down from shallow to deep. It also spirals in a bit, actualy nicely done for a 3d background..
The bottom, as foxfixh says, its a clifs overhang, something for a minimal planted Malawi cichlid tank. But the light play/ shadows spoil the depth. In the top one it creates depth.
The original orientation is “correct” - it’s a typical rift lake 3D background design with overhanging rock
I can just see the Paracyprichromis hanging out there 😉 ... just choose plants and fish carefully and you can do the perfect low light planted Tanganyikan tank 😀
If placing it on the bottom a small hole in it near the highest point to let the air inside it escape then glue probably won't be needed as the weight of the substrate should hold it down. Hole could be really small too.
I’m maintaining my 1st Way Right Way stance 😉
The background is painted as overhanging rock - “upsidedown” just looks odd
Out of interest, how big is the tank ?