Ady34 said:
Hi John,
you must have done a good job of scrubbing the BBA as not much evidence it was ever there! Maybe not what your looking for (either for the look of the scape or a 'remedy not reason' for the bba), but siamensis 'flying fox' are supposed to eat bba, and now its been scrubbed away they could keep it in check. I know its an obvious question but have you placed the dc in various positions around the tank to ensure even distribution of c02?
The plants are really filling in nicely now and if that glosso carpets fully this will look completely balanced and truly stunning. Great plant choices and positioning

.
Cheerio,
Ady.
It's almost a complete tank breakdown each time I do it and this is the third time i've had too now.
🙁
The moss is really taking a beating too as there is BBA in a lot of the fissendens. I do have a bucket load more I could replace it with but i'm trying to get the thread out of the tank as it is one of the BBA magnets.
I'm hoping that each time I do the full clean the underlaying issue will be have sorted and it won't come back, or at least come back in lesser force. This last clean I potentially could have been removing BBA that started to colonise before the changes I made to the CO2 timing through the reactor. Hopefully this will be the last of these big scrubs.
Siamese algae eaters - i'd rather not, i know of the fish but they are too large for the tank and i've heard bad things about them in the long run.
I'll put another drop checker in but I'm sceptical that CO2 distribution is the issue outright as I have so much flow with the two ex 1200's. But I might be getting a slight cancellation of flow in the central front area.....possibly.
Thanks for the compliments of plants. I'm really enjoying the glosso carpet after the initial hassles. The hydrocotyle is mental growth rates as I mentioned before but as long as you have no fear in hacking it back it really comes good.
awtong said:
At the front you have two areas of red/brown plants poking out behind the wood slightly left centre and behind the stone slightly right centre. Are these Crypts of some sort? maybe undulata?. I love the colour and texture of them and would love to know what they are.
The tank is looking great even if you have a few issues. As Ady states Siamese algae eaters are great for dealing with BBA. I have two in my 450l and never see any BBA.
Good luck with the algae,
Andy
Yes on the crypts although I don't have names for them. The larger of the two is possibly not Undulata as it is a little bit small with leaves no longer then 10cm. Its a deep red hammered appearance and sits low on the substrate when it's grown out. I nicked it from Seb (another Edinburgh UKAPS member) whom I help out with his tank, as it is a lovely fore ground crypt.
The other type (the smaller) is one I picked up from Outsideinside aquatics ages ago probably from a specialist grower in spain. I've been nursing it around through a couple of set up's as it is so small and dark brown/red. Again no name, even back checking through the tickets from all the plants I bought at the time.
There are some more of the same types dotted around, mostly hidden by hydrocotyle, that will become clearer once they mature and I do some creative pruning.
Westyggx said:
Looking good John, nice growth and again i cant see any BBA so good job on keeping on top of it!
Thanks!, but i have to say it is trying my patients.
-------
Overall I will give the scape another month with the current CO2 set up and see how it goes. I've learned before that changing things too often is as likely to set off algae as doing nothing at all.
I've been pondering a few things of late while reading here in regards to algae and dosing schedules.
Mark has been advocating a number of times the ADA'ish approach of reducing dosing and letting the soil do the work. Others the same, pushing the age old ideas that nitrates in the water cause more algae. Parts of which I'd got past through my years learning and using EI.
I look at the hassles i'm having with this scape in contrast to my corner (which is still running btw 8) ) both with EI, the corner with medium to low light, this scape with very high light, and it shows me how much more I still have to learn.
Always learning.
The high light growth rates are AMAZING. I hammered the glosso/hydro back to a cm above the substrate, down to bare stalks, so much that I thought i may have over done it. But boom a week later i've got a carpet again, better then ever.
The stems under high light are a revelation. Again hacking back to an inch from the substrate and within a week i've got new growth every where.
I'm used to using EI to superboost my plant growth but EI + aquasoil + high light is mental, almost too much (although this tank is designed that way).
My algae issues are just BBA and some GDA on the glass. The vast majority of BBA is occurring on the hardscape.
Because I made this tank hardscape heavy, and technically underplanted compared to most tanks (I was trying to be too arty too be honest) as soon as there is a fluctuation, or something somewhere goes slightly out of kilter, the BBA gets a foothold where it can. In my case since my EI knowledge (and substrate) has allowed my plants to grow well, the algae goes for the rocks. Of which i have many.
Now if i'd made a Iwagumi with three large rocks and the same plants the weekly water change and clean would be done in 30 minutes and i'd be reporting a lovely hassle free existance (i'd hope) of lush plant growth.
Because I went complicated hardscape with my wierder hardware set up, i created my own problems.
I could for example remove the retaining line of stones and replace the sand with more soil to have the glosso fully fill the tank, thus removing 90% of the hardscape the BBA is growing on.
Coming back to the EI vs ada'ish comment. I'm somewhat coming around to the thinking that with EI, it's designed to make plants grow well. Tom often references that soil substrates and EI have a lot in common in regards to providing the plant every thing it needs to grow well. Just in different ways.
With EI if you have a lush, full growth, almost everything is planted tank, which i've done before, like my corner is now. The turbo charged plant growth keeps the BBA from getting a foot hold on anything and any areas where it does go can be quickly removed. That is to say if you have a small outbreak for what ever reason.
With the ada'ish tank you get the faster growth rates from the nutrients being in the soil and get your lush growth, but the leaner water column dosing would mean when/if an algae out break occurs the algae have less to feed on and the growth would be slower and less extensive.
Now I am a lover of EI and will keep using it but what I'm getting at is this.
In a hard scape heavy, higher light intensity tank, would reducing the water column dosing by using soil substrates mainly be a better methodology then full EI, with the presumption that somewhere at some point an algae out break will happen and your clean up is going to be an on going nightmare due to your overly complex set up? 8)
Best Regards,
John