Andy D
Member
- Joined
- 27 Apr 2013
- Messages
- 1,461
Hi All,
I am having a 'debate' elsewhere (PFK) about what defines a tank as high-tech or low-tech. Now my understanding (and I believe that of UKAPS?) is that the addition of carbon via Glute or CO2 puts a tank in the high-tech category.
Clive's post explains all this very well - http://www.ukaps.org/forum/index.php?threads/Help-needed-with-low-CO2-setup.4676/
My questions on this are:
1. Who has come up with this definition?
2. Why is it referred to as low-tech and high-tech? The use of the word technology seems to cause further confusion.
Thanks in advance.
I am having a 'debate' elsewhere (PFK) about what defines a tank as high-tech or low-tech. Now my understanding (and I believe that of UKAPS?) is that the addition of carbon via Glute or CO2 puts a tank in the high-tech category.
Clive's post explains all this very well - http://www.ukaps.org/forum/index.php?threads/Help-needed-with-low-CO2-setup.4676/
My questions on this are:
1. Who has come up with this definition?
2. Why is it referred to as low-tech and high-tech? The use of the word technology seems to cause further confusion.
Thanks in advance.