Garuf said:
I used my fx5 for about 3 weeks but I really liked it, the quailty is good they extremely poweful I'd be guessing that the flow is closer to 70% of the quoted lph rather than the 50% associated with ehiems, the only real pay off is that you have to change the pipes to improve the flow and it's not as quiet as an ehiem. That can be solved with clever padding of the stand
Garuf, whilst i know you know your stuff, I would suggest that your opinion/comment on the flow of eheims to 50% of whats stated to be a little bold
😉 (Andy ducks behind the sofa for cover!
)
I have run many eheims over the years and found that not to be the case. I am Running a number at the moment on my setups and yes you get drop off like any filter but no way is it 50%, but then again that's just my experience and is not backed up by scientific testing. I suppose if i had the time i could you use my degree in fluid dynamics to analyze and put forward a compelling case, but i need a beer so i wont bother
I personally think that the manufacturers do it the right way be telling you the overall flow of the pump, as the number of variations of filter media is crazy. That way you can choose it all yourself.
I think what they do wrong is telling you that it suits a certain size tank. This can vary massively depending on what you are keeping say you keep big fish, this means large waste volume so again this is different kit selection to that of say a tank of Malawi Cichlids or a planted tank. They should just come with pump output and let the consumer choose.
Has anybody played around with all the different brands of media to see which gives flow? Balls, Hoops etc?
Phil, i would go eheim, they are bomb proof, silent and last for years.
But once again that's like asking which is better Audi or BMW?
😵 ................Its Audi by the way!