• You are viewing the forum as a Guest, please login (you can use your Facebook, Twitter, Google or Microsoft account to login) or register using this link: Log in or Sign Up

Comammox Nitrospira Dominates the Nitrifying Bacterial Community in the External Canister Biofilter in the Tank Fish Farm

dw1305

Expert
UKAPS Team
Joined
7 Apr 2008
Messages
18,304
Location
nr Bath
Hi all,
<"Comammox Nitrospira Dominates the Nitrifying Bacterial Community in the External Canister Biofilter in the Tank Fish Farm">
This paper talks about nitrification (and denitrification) in canister filters:

Abstract
Portable canister filters are often used in aquaria or smaller recirculating aquaculture systems (RAS) systems. However, the microbiome of these canister filters, especially the presence of comammox bacteria, has not been extensively studied. The aim of this study was to explain the mechanisms of nitrogen transformation, with a focus on the comammox process, in a portable filter under varying organic compound availability. Biomass samples were collected before and after feeding, and the microbial community was profiled using metagenomics and metatranscriptomics, with ecological relationships analyzed through network analysis. The results showed that comammox Nitrospira was the dominant nitrifier in the biofilter, with an average abundance of 4.2%, while other nitrifiers, such as Nitrosomonas, were present at significantly lower levels (e.g., 0.1% average abundance). High transcription levels of the amo, hao and nxr genes of comammox Nitrospira further indicated their critical role in nitrification within the filter. Aerobic denitrifiers, e.g. Pseudomonas, Flavobacterium and Aeromonas, were also abundant in the biofilter (8.3%, 4.2% and 1.6% average abundance respectively) . Nitrogen transformations varied across filter layers, with more intensive nitrification occurring in the lower layers and increased denitrification in the upper layers. After feeding, the increase in organic compounds favored the proliferation of heterotrophs, which competed with comammox Nitrospira and inhibited their activity. These findings provide insights into nitrogen conversion in canister filters at the molecular level and offer practical recommendations for engineers when designing this type of filter.
I've highlighted a few bits and I'll expand on them when I have time.

cheers Darrel
 
Hi all,
The results showed that comammox Nitrospira was the dominant nitrifier in the biofilter,
There is <"another paper"> by the same authors - <"Network of Nitrifying Bacteria in Aquarium Biofilters: An Unfaltering Cooperation Between Comammox Nitrospira and Ammonia-Oxidizing Archaea">. This is their filter set-up (so very similar to what many people will have).
water-17-00052-g001-550.jpg


Comammox Nitrospira were only originally discovered in the 21st Century (apparently as recently as 2015) <"Comammox - Wikipedia">, which goes to show why the traditional linear schematic for nitrification (TAN > NO2- > NO3-) is totally outdated.

It was this paper <"Frontiers | Freshwater Recirculating Aquaculture System Operations Drive Biofilter Bacterial Community Shifts around a Stable Nitrifying Consortium of Ammonia-Oxidizing Archaea and Comammox Nitrospira"> that originally made me aware of the Complete Ammonia Oxidation (comammox) process and eventually led to me <"contacting the Newton Lab.">, where Dr Barthelme had conducted his research.
High transcription levels of the amo, hao and nxr genes of comammox Nitrospira further indicated their critical role in nitrification within the filter
So that looks pretty conclusive, if you like it is the smoking gun.
After feeding, the increase in organic compounds favored the proliferation of heterotrophs, which competed with comammox Nitrospira and inhibited their activity
I've been <"down this route a lot">, don't use your filter as a syphon ................
and offer practical recommendations for engineers when designing this type of filter.
I haven't read this bit yet, so to be continued ....

cheers Darrel
 
Last edited:
Thank you so much for the articles, Darrel! Maybe it wouldn't be a bad idea to create a separate forum section for these (and other) scientific resources => e.g. Scientific Resources (or something like that).
 
Hi all,
Thank you so much for the articles, Darrel!
I'm pleased you've found them useful. I find them interesting, but I understand that is probably a minority view.
Maybe it wouldn't be a bad idea to create a separate forum section for these (and other) scientific resources => e.g. Scientific Resources (or something like that).
I have thought about collating a "cycling" guide (in much the same way as <"What is the “Duckweed Index” all about?">), partially the reason I haven't is that scientific advances are occurring so rapidly, and partially it is because "cycling" is a very divisive subject and I've received quite a lot of <"hate mail">, over an extended time period.

I probably should be a bit more thick-skinned about it, and bite the bullet, particularly now I have a lot more "ammunition".

cheers Darrel
 
Last edited:
I'm pleased you've found them useful. I find them interesting but I understand that is probably a minority view ...
Agree. I am creating a personal database of scientific articles or books that are somehow related to our hobby. I have a little over 500 articles already (in PDF), but only about 100 of them are in the database so far, and only about 20 are annotated in detail. It's slow going, but my goal is to create a list of topics [e.g., you select "nutrients (Fe)" and you'll see all the articles in the database that discuss iron (related to nutrition or toxicity of plants/animals, etc.)] with a search option. It's hard to do something like that on a forum, but at least we could add the most interesting studies (findings) here as a decoy. 🙂

Edit: Something like this:
1738842172973.png
 
Hi all,
...... and offer practical recommendations for engineers when designing this type of filter.
This bit is actually probably less useful to us. I think we are in <"thick and sticky biofilms"> territory, so probably much more relevant to non-planted aquariums, where <"microbe only"> nitrification is critically important.

a-well-functioning-aquarium-filter-768x535-jpg-jpg.215408

Image from <"6. Filtration">.

Contrary to earlier studies suggesting competition between comammox Nitrospira and AOA or AOB, this study found that comammox Nitrospira faced no competition from
other nitrifiers in the environment.
I think this is because of their kinetic advantage <"Kinetic analysis of a complete nitrifier reveals an oligotrophic lifestyle - PMC">.
However, fluctuations in organic compound levels due to alternating feeding schedule, resulted in strong pressure from heterotrophs, which assimilated ammonia for biomass growth.
and that is exactly <"what an intake pre-filter"> is <"going to stop from happening">.
Consequently, toxic nitrogen compounds were more effectively removed through assimilation and aerobic denitrification than through nitrification. Even small changes in water quality parameters in the RAS can significantly impact the bacterial community of the biofilter.
We have <"plants for fixed nitrogen assimilation"> and while aerobic denitrification is fine, it could easily tip over into oxygen deficiency, potentially resulting in a <"tsunami of ammonia">.
Edit: Something like this:
Very nice, a proper searchable database would make perfect sense.

cheers Darrel
 
Back
Top