• You are viewing the forum as a Guest, please login (you can use your Facebook, Twitter, Google or Microsoft account to login) or register using this link: Log in or Sign Up

Can someone explain simply please. CO2, aeration, KH and low tech tanks.

hamfist

Member
Joined
12 Oct 2023
Messages
65
Location
Southampton, UK
Hi, I believe aeration and KH can both affect availability of CO2 to plants in low tech tanks and have read a number of threads and sources about it. However, I am still trying to fit it all together into a "coherant whole" in my head. Surely there must be a simple explanation.

So, to maximise CO2 levels in non-CO2 injected tanks during the photoperiod, should one ........

  • reduce surface agitation ?
  • reduce or stop aeration ?
  • aim for any "ideal" KH range ?

I think ideally I should do the first 2, and have a "significant" KH level (maybe something like 5-8 dKH ?)

Obviously livestock needs also have to come into the equation and almost everything will be a compromise in the end, but if we ignore livestock, whats the situation purely for CO2 levels ?

Many thanks, Alan
 
In a low tech tank KH has no effect on dissolved CO2. Surface agitation and aeration do the same thing: they speed up how long it takes for CO2 levels (and oxygen levels as well) to stabilise with respect to atmosphere - aeration is much more effective at this than surface agitation. Unless you have something actively adding CO2 to the water (e.g. livestock but I suspect this is actually a pretty limited source) it doesn't matter whether you agitate/aerate or not. Aeration is nice because it keeps oxygen levels up for livestock, gives you some water column movement, disrupts biofilm and can 'look nice' depending on your perspectives on this type of thing. For sure your plants will be consuming CO2 during the photoperiod so if you want that replenished (from atmospheric CO2) you will need to agitate/aerate.

In a low-tech tank the ideal KH range is the same thing as the ideal pH range - they move together. What is 'ideal' depends on what you're trying to do, e.g. if you want caridina shrimp, KH needs to be 1 dKH or lower. Many people (including me) find most plant growth challenging at high KH e.g. 15+ dKH, but there are still some species that can be successful (alternanthera, crypts, quadricostatus, java fern, java moss etc.).
 
Hi all,
Edit: What @Andy Pierce says in the <"previous post">.
So, to maximise CO2 levels in non-CO2 injected tanks during the photoperiod, should one ........
  • reduce surface agitation ?
  • reduce or stop aeration ?
Other way around. If you are low tech the larger the gas exchange surface area is the more gas exchange you will have. More surface agitation means that more CO2 will diffuse into the tank water along the concentration gradient between water and atmosphere. If you don't have surface movement you can end up in the situation we had at <"Canford Park">.
but it was a pond and the water sample had a dissolved oxygen level of 180% (~20oC, 18mg/L DO) and a pH value of pH 10.5.
The high pH value is dependent on the amount of dissolved CO2, and we know that the <"equilibrium pH value in carbonate buffered water is ~pH8">, so we have very depleted CO2 levels (and conversely very raised oxygen levels).
  • aim for any "ideal" KH range ?
I think ideally I should do the first 2, and have a "significant" KH level (maybe something like 5-8 dKH ?)
This is a bit of a strange one, you need @hax47 or @Andy Pierce for the scientific explanation, but you have more Total Dissolved Inorganic Carbon (T(D)IC) in carbonate buffered water <"CO2 relationship to KH">, but it is less plant available for plants without adaptation to take up bicarbonate (HCO3-).

cheers Darrel
 
There are some conflicting schools of thought about this, so I'll just give my current thinking.

If you have a substrate with organic material (aquasoil, soil), CO2 from bacterial respiration decomposing the organic matter can greatly surpass atmospheric CO2. This decomposition requires oxygen, so I aim for a fair amount of gas exchange, but have never gone as far as adding extra aeration.

The "ideal" range for kh is as low as possible. I see no benefit to adding it unless your livestock requires it. Some people with ro water will add a half to 1 dkh, but others don't add any. I get 1.5 dkh out of the tap myself.
 
Back
Top