owenprescott
Member
I am just curious about an alternative method I assume would work though it appears to give me slightly different results to the calculation method. There are numerous calculators out there that put together the dimensions of a tank to calculate the amount of Gallons (UK, US) and Litres. So can these be used as an effective way of calculating how much substrate is needed?
Here is a nice tank(Volume) calculator http://www.regaltanks.co.uk/calculator/, most will want to go to the "regular tanks" tab though there are cylindrical alternatives too. Anyway if you fill in the length, width and height to the the same dimensions as your intended tank would it not work to just use the liquid height option to additionally calculate the amount of substrate needed?
Example...
In my case I am currently thinking of a tank at 32"L x 12"x 16"W (Inches). If I enter those dimensions into the calculator I get a max capacity of 101 Litres or 22 UK Gallons. I want an average of around 2 Inches of substrate so adding the 2 Inches into the "liquid height" tells me I would need 13 Litres or 3 UK Gallons of substrate.
So would you say this is an accurate method, obviously liquid is more dense so not sure if that effects the results. Just curious as the sticky gives slightly different numbers and this seems more efficient as you can also work out the liquid height and max capacity all in one go providing it works?
Here is a nice tank(Volume) calculator http://www.regaltanks.co.uk/calculator/, most will want to go to the "regular tanks" tab though there are cylindrical alternatives too. Anyway if you fill in the length, width and height to the the same dimensions as your intended tank would it not work to just use the liquid height option to additionally calculate the amount of substrate needed?
Example...
In my case I am currently thinking of a tank at 32"L x 12"x 16"W (Inches). If I enter those dimensions into the calculator I get a max capacity of 101 Litres or 22 UK Gallons. I want an average of around 2 Inches of substrate so adding the 2 Inches into the "liquid height" tells me I would need 13 Litres or 3 UK Gallons of substrate.
So would you say this is an accurate method, obviously liquid is more dense so not sure if that effects the results. Just curious as the sticky gives slightly different numbers and this seems more efficient as you can also work out the liquid height and max capacity all in one go providing it works?