• You are viewing the forum as a Guest, please login (you can use your Facebook, Twitter, Google or Microsoft account to login) or register using this link: Log in or Sign Up

How Much CO2 Do Fish Produce?

jaypeecee

Member
Joined
21 Jan 2015
Messages
2,921
Location
Bracknell
Hi Everyone,

OK, I realize that my question is not easy to answer and I'm not looking for a definitive reply. But, does anyone have any idea how much CO2 fish produce - either by excretion from the gills, urine or faeces? Indeed, which of these three would account for most of the CO2 produced by fish? I am assuming it would be mostly from the gills but I would welcome any replies. Is the amount of CO2 from the fish a significant source for live plants?

JPC
 
Co2 from fish respiration, on its own, is not really significant enough to contribute anything meaningful to plant growth. The graph below is from Diana Walstad's book and can be found in Updating Ecology of the Planted Aquarium. It gives you some idea of CO2 levels in an aquarium and how they change during the photoperiod.
In a soil substrate tank the CO2 released through the decomposition of the organic matter is perhaps a more significant source for plant growth, but as you can see from the graph below it soon becomes depleted during the photoperiod.
To compensate Diana advocates the siesta period during which the lights are turned off and photosynthesis ceases, this in turn allows CO2 levels to recover (the dotted line), but that is still a somewhat contentious issue.
I think many if us consider a stable CO2 conc to be more conducive to healthy plant growth, even if it means the conc is lower, and in a low-energy tank this is best achieved by ensuring good surface agitation and gas exchange. It also helps to increase O2 saturation which in turn increases aerobic decomposition and CO2 evolution. This technique works best in tanks with a large surface area to volume ratio; shallow tanks.
It's not apparent in the graph below since Diana was of the opinion that surface agitation wasn't desirable, since it off gassed CO2. She has since revised her opinion.

AQDu7sRl.jpg
 
Co2 from fish respiration, on its own, is not really significant enough to contribute anything meaningful to plant growth. The graph below is from Diana Walstad's book and can be found in Updating Ecology of the Planted Aquarium. It gives you some idea of CO2 levels in an aquarium and how they change during the photoperiod.
In a soil substrate tank the CO2 released through the decomposition of the organic matter is perhaps a more significant source for plant growth, but as you can see from the graph below it soon becomes depleted during the photoperiod.
To compensate Diana advocates the siesta period during which the lights are turn off and photosynthesis ceases, this in turn allows CO2 levels to recover (the dotted line), but that is still a somewhat contentious issue.
I think many if us consider a stable CO2 conc to be more conducive to healthy plant growth, even if it means the conc is lower, and in a low-energy tank this is best achieved by ensuring good surface agitation and gas exchange. It also helps to increase O2 saturation which in turn increases aerobic decomposition and CO2 evolution. This technique works best in tanks with a large surface area to volume ratio; shallow tanks.
It's not apparent in the graph below since Diana was of the opinion that surface agitation wasn't desirable, since it off gassed CO2. She has since revised her opinion.

AQDu7sRl.jpg

Hi Tim,

Thanks for the reply. I see what you mean - after just over two hours, CO2 is down to 4ppm. Not exactly conducive to plant growth! So, it's almost irrelevant what proportion of this figure is produced by the fish.

JPC
 
Hi Tim,

Thanks for the reply. I see what you mean - after just over two hours, CO2 is down to 4ppm. Not exactly conducive to plant growth! So, it's almost irrelevant what proportion of this figure is produced by the fish.

JPC
And 4 hours to build back up to near original levels! I always wondered how long to build back up
 
Back
Top