Presumably you are suggesting a smaller wattage heater? I don't think it will meaningfully change the energy requirements so long as the heater is thermostatically controlled i.e. is not on all the time. I use an Aquael Ultra Heater 25 in a 12.5L shrimp tank and I'm pretty happy with that. I use it to "top up" the temperature from 20C ambient to 22C just to make things a little nicer for the shrimp. Aquael's website suggests 50W is about right for 25L.There is an aqurment you don't need a 50W heater in a 24L tank.
I think you are right. Fast heating with 50 watts to reach temp verse slow heating to reach temp = approx same cost.I don't think it will meaningfully change the energy requirements so long as the heater is thermostatically controlled i.e. is not on all the time.
A smaller wattage heater won't reduce the energy requirements, but it will increase the safety of the tank inhabitants in the case of an "always on" heater failure.
Unless I was using an Inkbird (or similar temp controller) that provides an extra safety factor, I would always size heaters on the lower side. Say 1 watt per litre as an absolute maximum in a normal home environment. I would prefer the tank got a bit cooler when the ambient temperature falls low, rather than entertaining the possibility of coming home to a fish and shrimp chowder when the heater fails to permanently on. Slightly off topic from the original question, I know, but thought it was worth saying anyway.
Presumably you are suggesting a smaller wattage heater? I don't think it will meaningfully change the energy requirements so long as the heater is thermostatically controlled i.e. is not on all the time. I use an Aquael Ultra Heater 25 in a 12.5L shrimp tank and I'm pretty happy with that. I use it to "top up" the temperature from 20C ambient to 22C just to make things a little nicer for the shrimp. Aquael's website suggests 50W is about right for 25L.
I'm trying to work out the cost per day to now have a 50w heater in my 24L tank??