zanguli-ya-zamba
Seedling
Hi members,
how are you guys ?
I had two filters on my 70 G tank (FX5 and a 1100 L filter), I used to run an atomizer on the second one for my CO2 distribution, but this filter started to leak two weeks ago. Like the FX5 have completely different size of tubing I can't use my atomizer on it. I decided to put a 5cm ceramic disc in the tank, but I don't think it's enough efficient !
So yesterday night I decided to fit the tubing of CO2 into the cage of the intake of the FX5. I also decided to do this move, because on the FX5 the impeller is at the bottom of the filter and not at the top like most of the filter have, so I assume that it wont damage the pump.
after an hour running I couldn't see any bubbles or mist coming out of the outlet, so I assume that dissolution is OK in the filter + there no noise .
So my questions are:
Did someone here have already did this set up with this particular filer (or with an other) ?
Did this change was an efficient method of dissolution and distribution ?
And I just would like to know if I made the right change ?
thanks for your time and your answers guys..
Cheers
how are you guys ?
I had two filters on my 70 G tank (FX5 and a 1100 L filter), I used to run an atomizer on the second one for my CO2 distribution, but this filter started to leak two weeks ago. Like the FX5 have completely different size of tubing I can't use my atomizer on it. I decided to put a 5cm ceramic disc in the tank, but I don't think it's enough efficient !
So yesterday night I decided to fit the tubing of CO2 into the cage of the intake of the FX5. I also decided to do this move, because on the FX5 the impeller is at the bottom of the filter and not at the top like most of the filter have, so I assume that it wont damage the pump.
after an hour running I couldn't see any bubbles or mist coming out of the outlet, so I assume that dissolution is OK in the filter + there no noise .
So my questions are:
Did someone here have already did this set up with this particular filer (or with an other) ?
Did this change was an efficient method of dissolution and distribution ?
And I just would like to know if I made the right change ?
thanks for your time and your answers guys..
Cheers