Bobtastic
Member
Hi all,
I was wondering if anyone out there in UKAPS-land had ever compared, through experiments or otherwise, the AM1000 Co2 Reactor against the inline UP Atomiser and other ways of dissolving Co2 inline?
A bit of history; I am currently using an AM1000 and have gotten to thinking that it is slowing the flow of the filter it is attached to (Eheim 2078 Pro3e). It is currently running without the bio-balls to help improve the flow, but I am still getting lots of micro bubbles making it out of the spray bar and into the tank. I was under the impression that I was supposed to get near 100% diffusion.
In the case of the AM1000 vs the UP Atomiser is the difference in rates of diffusion enough to degate the difference in flow?
I was wondering if anyone out there in UKAPS-land had ever compared, through experiments or otherwise, the AM1000 Co2 Reactor against the inline UP Atomiser and other ways of dissolving Co2 inline?
A bit of history; I am currently using an AM1000 and have gotten to thinking that it is slowing the flow of the filter it is attached to (Eheim 2078 Pro3e). It is currently running without the bio-balls to help improve the flow, but I am still getting lots of micro bubbles making it out of the spray bar and into the tank. I was under the impression that I was supposed to get near 100% diffusion.
In the case of the AM1000 vs the UP Atomiser is the difference in rates of diffusion enough to degate the difference in flow?