So I’m now increasing the one light to 6 hours. Not there yet ...
Im replying here to your post in your other thread, to help the conversation return to the journal, hope you dont mind
🙂
I really dont think you should spend time gradually increasing your light to 6 hours.
Yes, gradual changes are good for the plants ability to readjust itself.
But, when you have an unfortunate situation going on, like a proper nutrient deficiency, or in your case a lack of sufficient light,
I really think its called for to go right to 6 hours immediately, no gradual change.
In my opinion this situation is different than (for example) someone already having good plant growth but want to try to add 2 more hours to their light period.
In that case I think it could be a good idea to do it a bit gradually, although doing it gradually is still not mandatory.
I hope
@John q can agree with me, I think he was the one who suggested going gradually to 6 hours.
I think a lot of us low tech folks run around 10 hours lighting period, so 6 hours really should be the lowest limit.
I have been running mine on 10 hours for many months and recently went up to 12 following the advice of Christel, our new plant expert.
Im sorry for making a bit of a deal out of this but I wouldnt want your plants to do poorly and you feel like you need to restart your tank again.
I have a theory that long lighting periods with relatively low light is beneficial for low tech setups.
Because the plants are only trickle fed small amounts of CO2, it makes sense to me that they could need more hours to "eat their fill".
(1-3 ppm CO2 in low tech vs 30 ppm in high tech)
But thats a tangent for another day.